Connect with us
Ghostbusters Afterlife Review
Image: Sony Pictures Releasing


Ghostbusters: Afterlife is a Tribute that Forgets What Made the Original Great

Discover the Past. Save the Future.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife Review

If you want an example of least-common-denominator fanboy pandering, Ghostbusters: Afterlife is the best example I can imagine. Here’s a film that borrows a great deal of iconography, easter eggs, and in-jokes from its source material. But not only does it have very little to offer on its own, but the film doesn’t appear to have much understanding of what made the original great.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife is directed by Jason Reitman, the son of the original film’s director Ivan Reitman, and Ivan is a producer. In an extremely unfortunate on-screen intro at the screening I attended, the younger Reitman — whose track record, wildly uneven as it is, shows that he’s too talented to go down as a pure nepotism case — reveals that his father sat by his side for the entire production. 

There’s a great deal that goes wrong here, but probably the worst thing is that the tone is all wrong for a Ghostbusters movie. There’s almost no comedy, and the action is set not in New York City but rather in its polar opposite, a small, dying mining town in Oklahoma.  

Really, Ghostbusters: Afterlife owes more to Stranger Things than anything having to do with Ghostbusters. That series has remixed the popular cinema of the 1980s, mostly the work of Steven Spielberg and various Stephen King adaptations, and that’s essentially the tone adopted here, which is a copy of a copy of a copy, and the sort of thing that’s really starting to get old at this point. I mean, J.J. Abrams’ Super 8, which kicked off this whole pseudo-Spielberg trend, is now ten years old.  

Ghostbusters: Afterlife
Image: Sony Pictures Releasing

Ghostbusters: Afterlife recruits Finn Wolfhard, one of the actors from Stranger Things, and features a John Williams-knockoff score by Rob Simonsen. There’s even a touch of Field of Dreams, in which extraordinary metaphysical steps are taken to provide an adult a way to gain closure on their unresolved relationship with their deceased parent. 

And while the feel of the film itself is nothing like Ghostbusters, the filmmakers attempt to make up for it with nearly endless fan service- references large and small to the original movie, and the sort of stuff that seemingly congratulates the audience on noticing things that were in a massively popular movie from almost 40 years ago. 

The conceit in the new movie is that a family (single mom Carrie Coon, and kids Wolfhard and McKenna Grace) has been evicted from their home and forced to move to the dilapidated rural farmhouse that belonged to Coon’s recently deceased father. It’s the Spielberg formula, once again, with absent fathers everywhere, and while I won’t spoil anything specific, the dead grandpa has ties to the Ghostbusters mythos. So in addition to the new director being the son of the old director, the people in the new movie just have to be related to the original ones. 

Soon, ghosts are haunting the town, with the kids teaming up with teacher Paul Rudd and a classmate named Podcast (yes, he hosts a podcast) to assume the Ghostbusters mantle. And that they do, in a series of indifferently directed CGI action sequences. 

McKenna Grace, as daughter Phoebe, is the best thing about the movie by a mile. A shy science genius who it’s implied is on the autism spectrum, she has an arc that’s actually compelling, which is more than I can say for her brother or “Podcast.” It is always nice to see Carrie Coon, so great on The Leftovers, in a big movie role, and Paul Rudd is Paul Rudd. 

Ghostbusters: Afterlife
Image: Sony Pictures Releasing

But the film squanders any of that goodwill by doing something at the end that I’m going to call wildly unethical. Yes, I’m sure the filmmakers got all the legal permissions they needed, but still- it’s just wrong. 

This, of course, isn’t the first attempt of late to reboot Ghostbusters, following its ’80s heyday. That was the 2016 revival, with a mostly female cast, which kicked off a fanboy revolt and underperformed at the box office. That film is remembered more these days as a cultural flashpoint than for anything that happened in the movie. 

I consider “Lady Ghostbusters” underrated, as it at least got the tone and location right, and also found a great way to use Kate McKinnon, a performer who the movies mostly haven’t quite known what to do with in the years since. If the 2016 film was “Lady Ghostbusters,” this is “Kids Ghostbusters“- and for various reasons, I don’t expect it to set off anywhere close to the same outcry. But nevertheless, as in The Rise of Skywalker following The Last Jedi, the angriest fanboys have won the day, as the ’16 Ghostbusters movie appears to have been retconned out of existence. 

I love the original film too. But if we’re going to celebrate the many great things about the 1984 Ghostbusters, I think the best tribute is to appreciate that movie on its own, instead of periodically paying homage to it. 

Written By

Stephen Silver is a journalist and film critic based in the Philadelphia area. He is the co-founder of the Philadelphia Film Critics Circle and a Rotten Tomatoes-listed critic since 2008, and his work has appeared in New York Press, Philly Voice, The Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Tablet, The Times of Israel, and In 2009, he became the first American journalist to interview both a sitting FCC chairman and a sitting host of "Jeopardy" on the same day.



  1. Trenton

    November 19, 2021 at 11:13 pm

    The fact that 90% of all movies that critics hate the public at large loves. This goes to show how out of touch they really are. It is a sad state of affairs’ when the is a large group of people and growing that go see movies because the critics hate it. This is due to them learning that all critics are is nothing more than a internet troll that does not hide behind a screen name.

  2. Jay Aldure

    November 21, 2021 at 12:12 am

    This guy literally almost said that 2016 was better because unlike this one, it takes place in New York. For a guy that claims to understand what made the original so great, him dedicating half of a paragraph about how this not being set in NYC being a travesty just proves he understood nothing about what made Ghostbusters great. This is literally the equivalent of people saying that a Comic adaptation is ‘a travesty’ because the main hero’s outfit is of a slightly different shade of color.. It’s both overwhelmingly trite and beyond irrelevant, yet he makes it sound like some kind of intellectual critique.
    Same would be said about his idiotic comment about how the 2016 movie “got the tone” of the original – I’m not sure how just random jokes with no heart or intensity is ‘the same tone’. Ghostbusters was a Horror/Comedy with heart, whereas that movie was Comedy without any Horror or Heart.
    I’m not even saying that this movie was good, as turning Ghostbusters into a quiet family drama with occasional ghosts and jokes isn’t exactly the tone of Ghostbusters either, but at the very least, it’s 2 movies in 5 years that miss the tone entirely, and at least with Afterlife, this was intentional.

  3. Jericho

    November 28, 2021 at 7:31 pm

    This movie was amazing!! I’ve been waiting for it for over a year! I had high expectations for it, and it exceeded them entirely! Don’t listen to this guy, he was probably to immersed in his popcorn and coke to even watch the movie.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



Anti-War Anti-War

Three Bestselling Anti-War Novels, Three A-List Film Adaptations…Three Flops:  Castle Keep, Catch-22, Slaughterhouse-Five


Vesper poster Vesper poster

Vesper: Sci-Fi That Thinks Big With Limited Means


Unforgiven movie review Unforgiven movie review

Unforgiven Ushered the Western into its Afterlife 


Your Full List of All Upcoming Marvel Movies Your Full List of All Upcoming Marvel Movies

A Full List Of Upcoming Marvel Studios Film And TV Releases


Robocop 1987 Robocop 1987

RoboCop is a Social Satire That Gets More Relevant With Age


Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman: The 10 Greatest Comic Issues Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman: The 10 Greatest Comic Issues

Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman: The 10 Greatest Comic Issues


Nope Nope

Jordan Peele’s Nope Explained: A Spectacle of “Bad Miracles”


Alex's War (2022) Alex's War (2022)

Alex’s War, a Documentary Study of Alex Jones, Misses the Big Picture 


All Out 2022 Predictions All Out 2022 Predictions

Way Too Early Predictions for All Out 2022


Signs movie review Signs movie review

M. Night Shyamalan Signs Finds Comfort at the End of the World


Biography: WWE Legends’ Look at Goldberg is One of the Best Wrestling Documentaries Ever 


Detective vs Sleuths Detective vs Sleuths

Detective vs. Sleuths: Buckle Up for a Bumpy Ride


Marvel at San Diego Comic-Con Marvel at San Diego Comic-Con

Marvel at San Diego Comic-Con 2022: A Full Recap


Bullet Train movie review Bullet Train movie review

Bullet Train Makes All the Wrong Stops


High Noon at 70: When Time is of the Essence


Sci-Fi And Superheroes Sci-Fi And Superheroes

Buried Treasures, Hidden Gems – Movies Due For a Revisit: Sci-Fi And Superheroes