Connect with us
Let Me In vs. Let The Right One In


Let Me In vs. Let The Right One In

10 Years Later: Let Me In vs. Let The Right One In

Even in a pop culture landscape littered with the bloodthirsty undead, Tomas Alfredson’s Let The Right One In stood out as a poignant coming of age story as well as a bone-chilling horror film. The haunting mediation on the difficult and often painful transition into adolescence garnered much praise on the festival circuit in 2008 and the film earned a loyal cult following through word of mouth. When Matt Reeves announced his American remake, those very same cinephiles lashed out in anger. The general consensus was, why fix something that isn’t broken?

Sadly, mainstream audiences seem to have a problem with subtitles, so it was inevitable that the film would be remade. That said, fans of the original should be grateful that Matt Reeves (Cloverfield), alongside legendary British horror brand Hammer Films (a studio that set a new tone for the vampire lore) got the job done— because Let Me In is an almost flawless film.

What is basically a remix of the highly-acclaimed film and the best-selling Swedish novel of the same name by John Ajvide Lindqvist, Let Me In is a haunting, provocative remake and in some ways is better than the original.

While originally pegged as their own vision of the novella, it’s clear that director Matt Reeves has mimicked Alfredson’s distinctive sense of style and looked to his adaptation for visual inspiration. Reeves takes a bold and critical step in shooting an almost shot-for-shot remake of the Swedish vampire flick. But by injecting his own craft, he finds a way to harden it with a little more emotion and flavor.

It’s clear from the start that another way Reeves differentiates his adaptation from the Swedish one is that Let Me In is actually frightening. Reeves opens midway through the story, quickly establishing the uneasy, foreboding tone as an ambulance transporting a victim of a brutal car accident wends its way through the dark, stormy, and winter terrain. It’s a gripping, unsettling, and truly horrific opening in which Reeves demonstrates an adept sense of how to generate dread and suspense through clever camera work, brisk framing, and suggestion. While many of the memorable set pieces from Alfredson’s film are recreated with precision (discovering the body under ice, gutting a victim in the woods, and the unforgettable pool scene), Reeves tweaks a few scenes by adding a bit more blood loss and ghastly prosthetics. In addition, he stages an entirely new, bravura car crash sequence and some unique p.o.v. shots that showcase better camera work than that of the original. Reeves also makes a conscious decision to strip away any glimpses of Owen’s mom and dad, reducing his parents to out of focus background figures or distant voices.

Let me In transports the snowbound 1990’s Swedish setting of the original to a small town in 1980’s Los Alamos, New Mexico. We’re in a bleak American landscape when the Cold War was still at its height and Ronald Reagan is seen on a television set giving his “Evil Empire” speech. Later on, after watching Abby attack a woman, Oscar makes a phone call to his absentee father, asking his dad, “Do you think there’s such thing as evil?” The entire set up is an interesting tie-in, showing how it would be like for a 12-year-old boy harboring dark feelings deep inside to grow up in that context.

Grieg Fraser’s cinematography is breathtaking, turning Los Alamos, New Mexico into a ghost town, a place cut off by a perpetual chill, and he sets Owen adrift in it. Tonally, the Swedish and American versions are the same especially when sculpting light and shadow, only Fraser at times opts for a brighter warmer colour palette when the two young leads are left alone. Blue becomes orange, and the winter cool feels early autumn. The contrast carefully compliments their relationship both with each other and the outside world without ever overpowering the story.

With the emotional resonances of the film resting on the narrow shoulders of its preteen protagonists, the filmmakers knew the chemistry between Abby and Owen was crucial. Credit to Avy Kaufman, the film’s casting director, who’s known for discovering a number of extraordinary child actors including Haley Joel Osment in The Sixth Sense, Max Pomeranc in Searching For Bobby Fischer and Adam Hahn-Bird in Little Man Tate. Chloe Moretz delivers a breakthrough performance; to the naked eye Abby appears to be caring and loving of Owen, but under further investigation, she’s actually quite sinister and devious. Moretz is a remarkable, intuitive actress who is able to project a presence far beyond her years. Her consistently enthralling turn as Abby undoubtedly matches (maybe exceeds) Lina Leandersson’s stellar performance in Alfredson’s 2008 original, while her more sympathetic presence makes this a more emotionally satisfying film to a certain extent. While there isn’t a lot of dialogue, Reeves finds clever ways to drive the innate soulless of his characters with skillful direction particularly in Kodi-McPhee’s stellar performance as Owen. A prime example of how Reeves dabbles in Owen’s breaking psyche is in a scene in which Owen, wearing a disfigured mask repeatedly stabs a mirror screaming. These small but important changes showcase Owen’s anger, fear, loneliness, frustration, and dark side. While Kåre Hedebrant (Owen’s equivalent in the original) has a slight edge in performance, Kodi’s unique goth look – jet black hair, long eyelashes, Morrisey-like haircut, dressed in Khakis and Izod sweaters look more the outsider.

Richard Jenkins, whose melancholic demeanor is put to good use as Moretz’s doomed caretaker equals that of Swedish actor (Per Ragnar playing the same part) but it’s Elias Koteas, in the added role of a police officer, that makes the biggest difference. Koteas, a seasoned character actor with an enviable resume both in film and TV, plays the nameless detective, trying to piece together the mysterious murders taking place in the small town. Koteas is another one of those guys who just plain does great work consistently, and here he makes for a credible moral compass while attempting to uncover the truth.

Finally echoing the prevailing, mournful tone is Michael Giacchino’s exquisite score, which is achingly poignant and far superior to that of the original Swedish film. Giacchino (who also contributed a piece of music to Cloverfield) sets the tenuous emotional tone of the film using a bell-like keyboard instrument called a celeste as well as a bass drum and a boy’s choir. His score is spare, haunting, rough at times, and reminiscent of some of Jerry Goldsmith’s best work.

The pressure in adapting a story or remaking a film is that the filmmakers already have an archetype to which everyone will compare their work to. Some people will be unwilling to invite this film in, but those who do will be rewarded. Let Me In is a film that achieves the rare feat of remaining faithful to its source material while emerging as a highly accomplished work in its own right.

Despite my statements above, it’s hard to argue Let Me In is a better film when considering Reeves was evidently influenced by Alfredson’s version. That said, Let Me In is every bit as valid a take on Lindqvist’s novel as the film by Tomas Alfredson was. Purists may be outraged by these statements, but Matt Reeves approached this material with a keen eye and a sharp wit. Unlike every other remake, Reeves clearly isn’t a director for hire. This isn’t a project started to make a buck. Reeves’s passion and love for both filmmaking and the original source material come through in every frame. Let Me In is a spectacularly moving and elegant movie, and to dismiss it as just a remake, is to overlook a remarkable film (even if it is missing the famous scene involving the cat).

Ricky D

Written By

Some people take my heart, others take my shoes, and some take me home. I write, I blog, I podcast, I edit, and I design websites. Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Goomba Stomp and Tilt Magazine. Host of the Sordid Cinema Podcast and NXpress Nintendo Podcast. Former Editor-In-Chief of Sound On Sight, and host of several podcasts including the Game of Thrones and Walking Dead podcasts, as well as Sound On Sight. There is nothing I like more than basketball, travelling, and animals. You can find me online writing about anime, TV, movies, games and so much more.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. A

    October 30, 2022 at 2:43 am

    Reading this frankly makes me wonder if Ricky D watched either of the films since he missed that the Swedish original (directed by Tomas Alfredson)takes place in the early 80s, not the 90s. It was not some artistic choice of Reeves’ to put his remake in the 80s. Because “Let Me In” is a bad copy of the original film. Everything from camera angles to set design as well as many scenes are just poor reconstructions of Alfredson’s film. And Reeves didn’t incorporate anything from the novel that wasn’t also in Alfredson’s film, I would frankly be shocked if Reeves’ has read it at all.

    To be clear I do not have anything against Reeves, I usually love his films. I also don’t have anything against American remakes of foreign films as a concept. Sometimes the remake can be just as good or even better than the original. But ‘Let me in’ is a horrible remake, it’s a horrible adaptation (if we pretend the novel had anything to do with it), And it’s simply not a good movie.

    For example, the changes Reeves made to the characters are, frankly, confusing. Our first impression of Owen is that he smuggles a kitchen knife into his bedroom, puts on an incredibly creepy mask and stands infront of the mirror, knife raised, and says: “Hey, little girl. Are you a little girl? Are you scared?” and right after that he starts spying on his female neighbor in an intimate situation. Through a damn telescope. Not for a second in the film are we lead to believe that Owen has an interest in space so the logical conclusion is that he wanted it to spy on people. So first impression of our main character is that he is a disgusting little pervert and probably a serious danger to women. The very generic horror movie-music doesn’t help either. Why should I be invested in that little incel? I don’t care if he gets bullied, I don’t care that his mum is some kind of born again christian and an alcoholic as Reeves want to insinuate.

    Compare that to our first meeting with Oskar. Before we even see him we hear his voice saying ‘Squeal like a pig. Do it.” And then we see his reflection in the window, no creepy mask, no knife and no music. It’s captivating. Something is up with this boy but we have no idea what or why.

    Reeves film basically do not know how to shut up. It delivers one horror movie trope after another to make sure that we KNOW this is a horror film and nothing can be left to the audience to figure out for ourselves EVERYTHING must be force fed to us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Robert Hight Illness: What Affected NHRA Drag Racer? 


Tara Palmeri Husband: The Truth About Her Love Life Uncovered!


Elise Finch Heart Attack: What Really Happened to the Prominent Meteorologist?


Donna Vekic Boyfriend: A Deep Dive into the Rumors!


Tyreek Hill Won’t Let Rick Ross Off The Hook For Filming His House Fire


Mr. Ibu Wife: Discovering the Truth About Mr. Ibu’s First Wife!


Who is Anthony Joshua’s Wife? Meet His Wife and Learn About Their Love Story!


Eydie Gorme’s Cause of Death Revealed! What Led to Her Demise?


Who Is Lainey Wilson Currently Dating? Discover Her Current Relationship Status!


Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco’s Relationship Timeline


Zayn Malik Shares Rare Insight Into Life Away From Spotlight With His Daughter Khai


Chris Mortensen’s Wife: Who Was He Married to Before His Demise?


Bill Maher Net Worth 2024: What Is The Comedian & TV Host Worth?


Jake Paul Girlfriend: Get to Know the Woman in His Life Right Now!


Olivia Dunne Slams Tiktok With ‘shadow Ban’ Claim After Major Drop-Off In Viewers


Who is Andy Farrell’s Wife? What You Need to Know About His Wife, Children, Career and Ethnicity!